Hinds Says UConn Penalties Won't Impact Decision | Zagsblog
Recent Posts
About ZagsBlog
Adam Zagoria covers basketball at all levels. He is the author of two books and an award-winning journalist whose articles have appeared in ESPN The Magazine, SLAM, Sheridan Hoops, Sports Illustrated, Basketball Times and in newspapers nationwide.
Follow Zags on Twitter
Couldn't connect with Twitter
Contact Zags
Connect with Zags:
Saturday / November 23.

Hinds Says UConn Penalties Won’t Impact Decision

Mount Vernon (N.Y.) senior point guard Jabarie Hinds says the penalties against the UConn men’s basketball program won’t impact his college decision.

“Not at all,” he said by text.

“I’m still considering them.”

The 5-foot-11 Hinds is considering UConn, UNLV and West Virginia, which he visits next weekend.

He previously told ZAGSBLOG UConn was “No. 1 on his list.”

UConn on Friday said its program committed major NCAA recruiting violations. The school has imposed its own sanctions, including two years’ probation and a loss of one scholarship for the next two seasons.

But the university says the evidence does not support the NCAA allegation that coach Jim Calhoun – who has won two national titles with the Huskies – failed to promote an atmosphere for compliance.

In a report released Friday, the school acknowledges its basketball staff made impermissible telephone calls and text messages as cited by the NCAA in a May report that followed a 15-month investigation. It also admits it improperly provided free game tickets to high school coaches and others.

A hearing is set for Oct. 15 before the NCAA infractions committee, which could accept UConn’s decision or impose additional penalties.

“I am deeply disappointed the university is in this position,” University of Connecticut President Philip E. Austin said in a statement. “It is clear mistakes have been made. This is a serious matter and we have worked in full cooperation with the NCAA. We look forward to fully resolving these issues and restoring our men’s basketball program to a level of unquestioned integrity.”

The responses, totaling more than 700 pages, were given to the NCAA on Sept. 7, but made public Friday after the school blacked out a significant number of items to comply with federal education privacy laws.

The biggest blemish on the program until now came in 1996, when UConn was stripped of its NCAA tournament run to the regional semifinals and ordered to return $90,970 in tournament revenue because two players accepted plane tickets from a sports agent.

But this is the first time the program has received a letter from the NCAA accusing the school of major violations. The case has no impact on the other athletic programs at UConn, such as its national champion women’s basketball team.

In the May report, UConn was cited as an institution for not adequately monitoring “the conduct and administration of the men’s basketball staff in the areas of: telephone records, representatives of the institution’s athletics interests; and, complimentary admissions or discretionary tickets.” The school acknowledged that violation, but said the NCAA has agreed to reduce the time-period for that violation from four years to two, spanning 2007-09.

Among the allegations against UConn is that staff members Beau Archibald and Patrick Sellers provided false and misleading information to NCAA investigators. Sellers, an assistant coach, and Archibald, who served as director of basketball operations, have resigned. They and Calhoun filed their own responses to the NCAA.

Calhoun’s response says he was not involved with the vast majority of the improper benefits, did not know they were being provided and “made reasonable efforts” to try to avoid the situation.

“Calhoun understands his obligation to monitor his staff and to report his knowledge of potential violations,” wrote his attorney, Scott Tompsett.

The coach also questions why he was singled out by investigators, when neither athletic director Jeff Hathaway nor the UConn compliance staff is “even referenced in the (allegations), much less charged with a major violation and put at risk for an individual penalty.”

Calhoun has coached 24 seasons at UConn and 38 overall, compiling a record of 823-358 that includes a 2009 final four trip in addition to the two NCAA crowns. He recently signed a five-year, $13 million contract.

Under the self-imposed sanctions, the scholarships for the men’s basketball program have been reduced from 13 to 12 for the 2010-11 and 2011-12 academic years. The school also has agreed to reduce the number of coaches to make calls to recruits and the number of “recruiting person days.”

UConn was just 18-16 last season and lost in the second round of the NIT, as Calhoun faced an undisclosed medical problem. He took a medical leave of absence in January and missed seven games.

He also has been treated for cancer three times while at UConn.

The NCAA and the school have been investigating the program since shortly after a report by Yahoo! Sports in March 2009 that former team manager Josh Nochimson helped guide Nate Miles to Connecticut, giving him lodging, transportation, meals and representation.

As a former team manager, Nochimson is considered a representative of UConn’s athletic interests by the NCAA and prohibited from having contact with Miles or giving him anything of value.

Most of the allegations appear to deal with Miles, but the names of all recruits were redacted by UConn from the NCAA letter and its response.

Calhoun said in his response that he investigated whether there was an improper relationship between Nochimson and the recruit, and he warned the player.

“If a prospect and an agent are going to engage in conduct violative of NCAA legislation hundreds and thousands of miles away from campus, there is only so much a head coach can do to prevent the conduct,” his attorney wrote.

Miles was expelled from UConn in October 2008 without playing a game for the Huskies. He was charged with violating a restraining order in a case involving a woman who claimed he assaulted her.

(The AP contributed)

Latest comments

  • of course they wont effect his decision because the self imposed penalties are a joke

  • Very sorry to hear….

    UConn’s position against the NCAA.
    Expect some more FIRINGs.

    Will this be the END of Austin?
    Will Austin be FIRED after the NCAA makes its finally decision.
    Based on Austin position, after reading all the inside documents, HE should be fired.

    The nation understands that UConn was hiding its Sept7 response. It took almost 60 days to BLACK OUT certain items.

    So, what will the NCAA do
    a) Three year probation.
    b) Two scholarships taken away, every year on probation.
    c)Restrictions to recruiting, official visits…etc
    d)FIRE xxxxxx
    e)FIRE the AD.
    f)Maybe Austin will have to be FIRED.

    The NCAA has to follow precedence ,from this year.

  • For the PLAYERS SAKE….

    The PLAYERs need to ask UCONN…is ther precedence in this matter?? ASK UCONN the right question RECRUITs.

    The NCAA has it hands tied.

    PRECEDENCE….

    In the case involving Lute:
    He sufferred a heart attack. While dealing with the health, someone forged a signature on a letter.

    For this , the NCAA penalites were:
    a) Two scholarships taken away, every year on probation.
    b)Restrictions to recruiting, official visits…etc
    c)FIRE Lute
    d)FIRE the AD.
    e)The President was spared because he agreed with the ncaa. (So, AUSTIN must be fired. This guy can not see lack of control! WOW.)

    The NCAA has to follow precedence ,from this year.

    (Prior to this case…the NCAA used the USC case, as its example)
    What happened there…

  • And what exactly would you propose they do for the self imposed sanctions so theyre satisfactory to you? Also..Austin is the president of the university, not the AD. Furthermore, he wasn’t at UConn when the violations occured. Not saying that they shouldn’t be punished but take it easy with the USC comparisons.

  • Jessiewildcat never knows what the hell he/she is talking about. Just always rambles on and gotta ignore that person just like everyone else. He/she shames all legit Arizona fans.

  • JonHuskyMS, Jessie’s little bull$hit rants aren’t as funny when they’re directed at UConn are they? No “Love ya bro” or “I just love to get him going” for this thread, huh?

    Jessie, for the sake of full disclosure we should once again remind everybody that while your ripping on programs like KU, UK, UConn, etc. your program (Arizona Wildcats) is on probation, correct?

  • no reason to penalize the current players or potential future ones. they didnt do anything wrong, just like with pearl…penalize the coach. suspend calhoun for half a season or an entire season from coaching/recruiting. these reduction of scholarships are silly since the 13th man on every team, even the elite ones, are usually guys that never play or a walk-on given a ride for a season.

    the guys love coaching…take away what they love and they wont be as reckless. but dont penalize the kids

  • I agree with you Boston that the NCAA should not punish the current players or future players but rather the coach, A.D., and school.

  • Woody take it easy…unlike yourself I don’t let myself get all worked up over JW…all fun and games. Now go get your tissues and enjoy your Sunday!

leave a comment

  • X